E63011231 /East of England evidence profile

East of England evidence profile

Stevenage digital planning profile

Stevenage is a large, non-coastal built-up area in East of England. ONS records show a 2021 population of 94,462; the population expanded quickly between 2001 and 2021, while the 2015 to 2024 employment series shows strong employment expansion. This profile turns those public observations into a reviewable website-planning brief without claiming that the figures measure searches, leads or Mosalio's physical presence.

Large BUA24WorkingONS data / no demand claim

01 / Data snapshot

What the reviewed source records

2021 population94,46217% since 2001
Employment change25%2015 to 2024
Economic inactivity32.2%published ONS proportion
2023 median house price£330,000242.9% since 2001
Town classificationWorkingLarge built-up area
Relative accessNearerto a major town or city
BUA24 code
E63011231
ITL1 region
East of England
Coastal
Non-coastal
Income-deprivation flag
Higher deprivation

02 / Context

Three comparisons, with the benchmark stated

Population change+17%

5.8% above the 11.2% median across complete England records in this ONS file.

Employment change+25%

25% above the 0% dataset median.

House-price growth+242.9%

18.8% above the 224.1% dataset median.

These medians use every complete England record accepted from the same ONS file. They are descriptive context, not targets, forecasts or a national demand model.

03 / Distinctive pattern

Where this record sits within 936 complete England profiles

Economic inactivity32.2%

Lowest decile · percentile position 6.7 of 100.

2021 population94,462

Highest decile · percentile position 92.4 of 100.

Population aged 65 or over14.6%

Lower quartile · percentile position 10.3 of 100.

These are the three values furthest from the middle percentile position for this record. A higher position means a higher published value, not a better outcome or evidence of search demand.

Evidence fingerprint: sha256:8a0ddd5b30a…8249271f013f

04 / Constrained peers

Three named comparisons from the same reviewed source

Each peer is selected from all 936complete England records using the documented eight-metric distance. Deltas are Stevenage minus the named peer; a plus sign means the value recorded for Stevenage is higher.

Regional peer

Chelmsford · E63011563

East of England. Nearest complete record in East of England. ONS classification: Nearer - Lower deprivation - Working.

2021 population
-16,150 people
Population change, 2001 to 2021
-4.1 pp
Economic inactivity
-1.8 pp
Employment change, 2015 to 2024
+9.2 pp
2023 median house price
-£40,000
House-price growth, 2001 to 2023
+19.8 pp
Population aged under 25
+1.2 pp
Population aged 65 or over
-2.1 pp

Classification peer

Crawley (Crawley) · E63013038

South East. Nearest complete record outside East of England with the same ONS combined classification. ONS classification: Nearer - Higher deprivation - Working.

2021 population
-25,744 people
Population change, 2001 to 2021
-3.7 pp
Economic inactivity
+0.5 pp
Employment change, 2015 to 2024
+16.6 pp
2023 median house price
-£15,000
House-price growth, 2001 to 2023
+38.9 pp
Population aged under 25
-0.7 pp
Population aged 65 or over
+1.5 pp

National peer

Gravesend · E63012186

South East. Nearest remaining complete England record. ONS classification: Nearer - Higher deprivation - Residential.

2021 population
+36,909 people
Population change, 2001 to 2021
+4.2 pp
Economic inactivity
-4.1 pp
Employment change, 2015 to 2024
+5 pp
2023 median house price
+£5,000
House-price growth, 2001 to 2023
-6.6 pp
Population aged under 25
-1.2 pp
Population aged 65 or over
-1 pp

05 / Evidence synthesis

Stevenage evidence synthesis: Economic inactivity, 2021 population, Population aged 65 or over

Stevenage is recorded as a large, non-coastal, working built-up area, nearer to a major town or city. This classification sets a transparent frame for the three observations below; it is not a persona, a service-area promise or proof of local search demand. Each finding pairs one distinctive percentile measure with one independently selected peer and one explicit validation route.

Eight-metric evidence matrix

2021 population94,462Highest decile · percentile 92.4 · higher published valueRegional peer Chelmsford: -16,150 people (lower) · Classification peer Crawley (Crawley): -25,744 people (lower) · National peer Gravesend: +36,909 people (higher)
Population change, 2001 to 202117%Middle half · percentile 70.1 · higher published valueRegional peer Chelmsford: -4.1 pp (lower) · Classification peer Crawley (Crawley): -3.7 pp (lower) · National peer Gravesend: +4.2 pp (higher)
Economic inactivity32.2%Lowest decile · percentile 6.7 · lower published valueRegional peer Chelmsford: -1.8 pp (lower) · Classification peer Crawley (Crawley): +0.5 pp (higher) · National peer Gravesend: -4.1 pp (lower)
Employment change, 2015 to 202425%Upper quartile · percentile 88.3 · higher published valueRegional peer Chelmsford: +9.2 pp (higher) · Classification peer Crawley (Crawley): +16.6 pp (higher) · National peer Gravesend: +5 pp (higher)
2023 median house price£330,000Middle half · percentile 70.9 · higher published valueRegional peer Chelmsford: -£40,000 (lower) · Classification peer Crawley (Crawley): -£15,000 (lower) · National peer Gravesend: +£5,000 (higher)
House-price growth, 2001 to 2023242.9%Middle half · percentile 67.1 · higher published valueRegional peer Chelmsford: +19.8 pp (higher) · Classification peer Crawley (Crawley): +38.9 pp (higher) · National peer Gravesend: -6.6 pp (lower)
Population aged under 2530.1%Upper quartile · percentile 80.7 · higher published valueRegional peer Chelmsford: +1.2 pp (higher) · Classification peer Crawley (Crawley): -0.7 pp (lower) · National peer Gravesend: -1.2 pp (lower)
Population aged 65 or over14.6%Lower quartile · percentile 10.3 · lower published valueRegional peer Chelmsford: -2.1 pp (lower) · Classification peer Crawley (Crawley): +1.5 pp (higher) · National peer Gravesend: -1 pp (lower)

The matrix shows every measure used by the peer-distance method, not only the three most distinctive values. Direction describes the published value relative to the middle percentile position; it is not a positive or negative judgement.

Highest-to-lowest percentile order: 2021 population → Employment change, 2015 to 2024 → Population aged under 25 → 2023 median house price → Population change, 2001 to 2021 → House-price growth, 2001 to 2023 → Population aged 65 or over → Economic inactivity.

Furthest-to-nearest distance from the middle percentile: Economic inactivity → 2021 population → Population aged 65 or over → Employment change, 2015 to 2024 → Population aged under 25 → 2023 median house price → Population change, 2001 to 2021 → House-price growth, 2001 to 2023.

Regional peer

Economic inactivity: 32.2% · Chelmsford delta -1.8 pp

At 32.2%, economic inactivity places Stevenage in the lowest decile and at percentile 6.7 of the reviewed distribution. The constrained regional comparison is Chelmsford (E63011563). On this measure, Stevenage minus that record is -1.8 pp; the selection basis is nearest complete record in east of england. Use the contrast to prioritise research into assisted, accessible and non-digital completion routes. A decision should wait for accessibility testing across real tasks and support-channel evidence. No user or market conclusion follows automatically; an aggregate inactivity rate cannot describe an individual visitor.

Classification peer

2021 population: 94,462 · Crawley (Crawley) delta -25,744 people

Among the eight reviewed measures, 2021 population stands out for Stevenage at 94,462; its percentile position is 92.4 and its band is highest decile. For a bounded comparison rather than a national average, Crawley (Crawley) supplies the classification reference; Stevenage is -25,744 people from it on the displayed scale. Use the contrast to prioritise research into content hierarchy and service-capacity assumptions. A decision should wait for task-frequency interviews and observed completion data. This remains contextual evidence—population size does not establish addressable demand.

National peer

Population aged 65 or over: 14.6% · Gravesend delta -1 pp

At 14.6%, population aged 65 or over places Stevenage in the lower quartile and at percentile 10.3 of the reviewed distribution. Against Gravesend's reviewed national record, the displayed delta is -1 pp. That comparator comes from the documented rule: nearest remaining complete england record. For planning, document the observation beside readability, keyboard access and assisted alternatives and require inclusive usability sessions and accessibility conformance checks before treating the idea as an accepted requirement. This remains contextual evidence—an age-group share does not determine digital ability.

Together, economic inactivity, 2021 population, population aged 65 or over and the constrained comparisons with Chelmsford, Crawley (Crawley), Gravesend create three separate research tracks for Stevenage. They do not form a demand score. Keep each hypothesis independently testable, record contradictory findings and remove a planning assumption when user evidence does not support it.

06 / Evidence interpretation

Planning signals before design decisions

Population context: 94,462 people in 2021

Stevenage's recorded population changed from 80,711 in 2001 to 94,462 in 2021 (+17%). This historical direction can inform content governance and capacity planning, but it is not a forecast and does not establish demand for a particular service.

Audience context: 14.6% aged 65 or over

The 2021 age-group series records 19,486 people aged 0 to 15, 8,976 aged 16 to 24, 52,165 aged 25 to 64 and 13,819 aged 65 or over. Small differences from the headline population reflect the published source series; percentages here use the age-group total and should guide testing questions, not stereotypes.

Activity context: 32.2% economically inactive

ONS records economic inactivity at 32.2%. The published composition includes 17.5% retired, 3.7% long-term sick or disabled, 3.6% students and 4.6% looking after home or family. These categories support inclusive task design; they do not identify individual users or purchasing intent.

Economic context: £330,000 median house price in 2023

The median house-price series moved from £96,250 in 2001 to £309,000 in 2021 and £330,000 in 2023, a published change of +242.9%. It is contextual evidence only—not a current affordability, revenue or customer-value estimate.

07 / Independent question set

Questions this evidence cannot answer on its own

These questions convert the profile-specific observations into falsifiable discovery work. They are not recommendations to create a service, location or page, and each needs direct user or behavioural evidence before it changes a website brief.

  1. 01

    Which real user task would justify changing assisted, accessible and non-digital completion routes after seeing Stevenage's economic inactivity position and its -1.8 pp difference from Chelmsford?

    The prompt combines one distinctive metric with the named regional comparator selected by the eight-metric method. It does not treat either record as search, lead or customer evidence.

  2. 02

    How should a prototype test content hierarchy and service-capacity assumptions without assuming that Stevenage's percentile 92.4 position predicts an individual user's needs?

    The prompt combines one distinctive metric with the named classification comparator selected by the eight-metric method. It does not treat either record as search, lead or customer evidence.

  3. 03

    Before prioritising readability, keyboard access and assisted alternatives, which part of inclusive usability sessions and accessibility conformance checks would verify whether this population aged 65 or over observation matters to users in Stevenage?

    The prompt combines one distinctive metric with the named national comparator selected by the eight-metric method. It does not treat either record as search, lead or customer evidence.

  4. 04

    For Stevenage's large, non-coastal, working built-up area, nearer to a major town or city classification, how should economic inactivity, 2021 population, population aged 65 or over be tested as separate website hypotheses without turning the combined pattern into a claim about local demand?

    Cross-check all three named comparisons—Chelmsford, Crawley (Crawley), Gravesend—and define a user-research or behavioural measure for each question before changing navigation, page scope or conversion paths. The observations share one source but do not demonstrate causation.

08 / Practical brief

Website-planning recommendations for this evidence pattern

  1. 01

    Separate employer and customer journeys

    Stevenage is classified as a working town. A useful website brief should separate recruitment, procurement and customer tasks, then give each journey its own proof, contact route and success measure instead of forcing every visitor through one generic enquiry page.

  2. 02

    Differentiate from the nearby major centre

    Stevenage is nearer to a major town or city. Use specific offer boundaries, proof and response expectations to explain why the organisation is relevant; do not rely on a place-name heading or create a doorway that simply redirects users to a national service page.

  3. 03

    Support quick comparison without hiding detail

    30.1% of the recorded 2021 age-group total is under 25. Lead with concise task summaries and responsive performance, while keeping fees, eligibility, privacy and next steps available in the same journey rather than behind a social-only channel.

  4. 04

    Prepare the content model for change

    Stevenage recorded +17% population change from 2001 to 2021 and +25% employment change from 2015 to 2024. Use owned templates, update dates, accountable content roles and measurable conversion events so the site can evolve without publishing unreviewed route permutations.

09 / Method and limits

What this profile can—and cannot—support

This is a Mosalio editorial interpretation of the ONS May 2026 dataset for BUA24 code E63011231. The source periods differ by metric; values are historical, not live. The profile deliberately excludes ONS experimental visitor-to-resident fields and makes no claim about search volume, rankings, customers, a Mosalio office or physical delivery in Stevenage.

Mosalio does not claim an office, staff member, customer, or physical-delivery presence in Stevenage.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Understanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends, released . This Mosalio interpretation was first published on and last reviewed on .

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How this page was made: Mosalio applies one documented, deterministic transform to the validated ONS record, calculates the displayed comparisons, and renders the result from source-controlled data. It is an automated public-data resource, not individually commissioned local market research. A portfolio-level editorial-value review checks every profile's source identity, distinctive metrics, peer evidence, synthesis and planning questions before index eligibility can be enabled.

Analysis basis: Midrank percentile across all accepted England records; a higher percentile means a higher published value, not a better outcome. Root-mean-square Euclidean distance across eight clipped robust z-scores; population and 2023 house price are log-transformed before median/MAD scaling.

Live chatWhatsApp